USPTO serial 75747390
INTRADYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTRADYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUSES, NAMELY, VENOUS INTRODUCER SHEATHS FOR ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, VENOUS HAEMOSTASIS INTRODUCER SHEATHS FOR ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, VENOUS HAEMOSTASIS INTRODUCER SHEATHS SIDEWIRE FOR ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, INTENSIVE CARE KIT FOR ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, ARTERIAL HEMOSTATS INTRODUCER SHEATHS FOR INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY, PEDIATRIC INTRODUCER SHEATHS, PEEL-AWAY INTRODUCER SHEATHS FOR IMPLANTATION OF PACEMAKER LEADS,CATHETER CONTAMINATION GUARD FOR HAEMOSTASIS INTRODUCER SHEATHS, HAEMOSTASIS VALVE FOR INSERTION OF CATHETERS AND PROBES, VALVES FOR ARTERIAL AND VENOUS USE, VENOUS SIDEPORT ADAPTERS, ARTERIAL SIDEPORT ADAPTERS, OBTURATORS FOR VENOUS HAEMOSTASIS INTRODUCER SHEATHS, PUNCTURE NEEDLES, PUNCTURE NEEDLES WITH SIDEPORT FOR LATERAL INSERTION OF GUIDE WIRE, GUIDE WIRES, VESSEL DILATORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |