USPTO serial 75748482
GENOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RILEY, CAITLIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Lewis
GEORGE LEWIS JACOBSON, PRICE, HOKMAN & STERN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH SREET, N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, JACKETS, BLOUSONS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SPORT SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, VESTS, CARDIGANS, RAINWEAR, GLOVES, SOCKS, HATS, CAPS AND SWEATERS, GOLFWEAR, NAMELY, GOLF PANTS, GOLF SHIRTS, WIND RESISTANT GOLF JACKETS, RAINWEAR FOR GOLF, AND GOLF SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GOLF EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GOLF TEES, BALL MARKERS, PEGS, GOLF EXERCISE INSTRUMENTS, GOLF CLUB SWING AIDS, GOLF PUTTING AIDS, DISTANCE MEASURING INSTRUMENTS, GOLF CLUBS, GOLF BALLS, GOLF BAGS, GOLF GLOVES, HEAD COVERS FOR GOLF CLUBS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |