USPTO serial 75748629
ZANZIBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2929063Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZANZIBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, EAU DE PARFUM, EAU DE TOILETTE, PERFUMED MILK, CREAM, LOTION AND POWDER FOR BODY CARE, SHAVING CREAMS, PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, SOAPS, DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE, TALC, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY CREAMS AND LOTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS VAN CLEEF & ARPELS S. A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ZANZIBAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |