USPTO serial 75748651
DIRECTLETTER.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECTLETTER.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Paterson, NJ
West Paterson, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia K Nicholson
JEANETTE S ZIMMER SCHIFF HARDIN & WAITEPO BOX 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MAILING LIST PREPARATION; PREPARING MARKETING REPORTS CONSISTING OF RESPONSES TO MASS MAILINGS; PREPARATION, DISSEMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF MARKETING MATERIALS FOR OTHERS VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL; AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |