USPTO serial 75750006
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. McCauley
Catherine M. McCauley Law Office of Catherine M. McCauleyP. O. Box 500Castleton, VT 05735-0500UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction for adults for distance learning through the use of the internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 24, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 8, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |