USPTO serial 75751399
MIPS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2881941Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIPS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY L. SHAPIRO
MARY L. SHAPIRO LAW OFFICE OF MARY L. SHAPIRO244 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 507SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in, and for use in the design, description and testing of computing devices, computer hardware and code; computer software for describing, designing, testing, modeling, simulating, compiling, debugging, developing, verifying, interfacing, and constructing computing devices, component parts therefor, computer hardware and code; computing devices and electronic devices, namely, integrated circuits, circuit chips, and microprocessors; printed circuit boards, semiconductors, semiconductor devices, component parts therefor, namely, integrated circuits, circuit chips and microprocessors; microprocessor cores; instruction set architectures, extensions to instruction set architectures, and processor architectures for integrated circuits, namely, microprocessors; computer code products, namely, device drivers, operating system software and application programs, namely, compilers; user manuals, data sheets, brochures and literature sold as a unit with all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 2000 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting seminars, workshops and tutorials in the field of embedded computer systems and in the use and operation of computer technology, including computer hardware and software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Maintenance of computer software; technical support of computer hardware and software provided via telephone, written and electronic consultation and in person visits; providing information relating to computer technology, hardware and computer code, including intellectual property licensing, instruction set architectures, processor architectures, programming models, integrated circuits, circuit chips, semiconductors, circuit chipsets, computer hardware, printed circuit boards, microprocessors, microprocessor cores, application software, operating system software, computer code for use in the development, design, modeling, simulation, compiling, debugging, verification, construction and [in terfacing] * interfacing * of hardware and code, and computer code descriptive of hardware design ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MIPS TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |