Drawing for ALARMAIL

USPTO serial 75752124

ALARMAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALARMAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD E HELGET

GERALD E HELGET BRIGGS & MORGAN, PA2400 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATIONS AMONG ALARM, SECURITY OR DETECTION SYSTEMS; REMOTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY PAGERS, CELL PHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, PERSONAL AND HANDHELD COMPUTERS; AND ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING STATIONSACTIVEMar 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 29, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 16, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 29, 2000WRDAWITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL
Nov 8, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance