USPTO serial 75754428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Laguna Hills, CA
Laguna Hills, CA
Laguna Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric K. Karich
POLAPHAT VERAVANICH O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP114 PACIFICA STE 100IRVINE, CA 92618-3315UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer assisted conference and convention communication and identification facilitator system, namely, identification badges imprinted with attendee names and unique alphanumeric identifiers, each of the unique alphanumeric identifiers being useful for reference information about the attendee through one of a plurality of hand-held computers distributed at the conference or convention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 26, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |