USPTO serial 75756507
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K WADE
STEPHANIE K WADE ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | directed evolution services; namely the recombination of genes customized to the specification of others to produce novel gene sequences for use in science, research, chemistry, agriculture, medicine, and industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | chemical research services; scientific research services; research and testing services in the fields of bacteriology and virology; research and product development services for others in the fields of genetics and gene therapy, transgenic plants, chemistry, pharmaceuticals, medical diagnostics, herbicides, pesticides, biopesticides, cytotoxic agents, bacteriology, virology, biocatalysis, metabolic pathways, and biochemical pathways, and other utilities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |