USPTO serial 75757677
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lake Buena Vista, FL
Lake Buena Vista, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE6665-A OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY-- T- SHIRTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, BLOUSES, SWEATSHIRTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, CHEF JACKETS, CHEF APRONS, CHEF HATS, HATS, CAPS, BASEBALL CAPS, SCARFS, TIES, SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |