USPTO serial 75758906
RGM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RGM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
FRESNO, CA
Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terry L. Miller
TERRY L MILLER TERRY L MILLER & ASSOC24832 VIA SAN FERNANDOMISSION VIEJO, CA 92692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Skylights; shingles composed of fiberglass mat asphalt; roof covering materials, namely, high profile ridge capping and roll roofing composed of fiberglass mat asphalt, hip and ridge shingles and non-metal gutters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RGM PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ridglass Shingle Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named RGM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |