USPTO serial 75762830
EMARKETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMARKETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
34355 Staufenberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Morris. Jr.
RICHARD L MORRIS. JR TRADEMARK SERVICESP O BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services, namely, assisting marketers in directing traffic to their web sites located on a global computer network via establishing links from corporate web sites, targeting banner advertising, distributing press releases, submitting advertising listings to search engines and directories, distributing direct E-mail advertising, building community networks, recruiting affiliates, localizing corporate web sites, supplying list servers, executive forums, video conferencing, and other community services for developing communities of customers, vendors and experts in the industries the marketers serve | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |