Drawing for 1-800 COMPUTER

USPTO serial 75763712

1-800 COMPUTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800 COMPUTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOEL S. GOLDHAMMER

JOEL S GOLDHAMMER AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR VARIOUS APPLICATIONSACTIVE
035COMPUTERIZED ONLINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 9, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Aug 3, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance