Drawing for PHIL

USPTO serial 75768206

PHIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PHIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seymour Rothstein

SEYMOUR ROTHSTEIN OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR 36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded recordings, namely documentary video recordings, video discs, DVD recordings, video cassettes, records, disks, diskettes, magnetic tapes, magnetic cassettes, compact discs, motion picture films and videotapes, all of these goods in the field of human resource managementABANDONED
014Watches; jewelry including lapel pinsABANDONED
016Printed material, namely, books, newspapers, journals, magazines, documentary scripts, posters, calendars and diaries, all of these goods in the field of human resouce managementABANDONED
025Clothing, namely, T-shirts, ties and jackets; headwear, namely, clothing capsABANDONED
028Games and toys, namely, plush toys, marionettes and dollsABANDONED
041Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of human resource management for corporations; training services corporate education and training in the field of human resource management for corporationsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 29, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 29, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 29, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 11, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 31, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance