USPTO serial 75768651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Schaumburg, IL
Schaumburg, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melody L. Schottle
THOMAS M WILLIAMS BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones, cellular telephones, radio telephones, pagers, two-way radios, radio transmitters, radio receivers, radio transceivers, radio base stations, electronic organizers, global positioning units, batteries, battery chargers, power adapters, antennas, carrying cases for the foregoing goods and replacement parts for the foregoing goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |