Drawing for WORRY-FREE

USPTO serial 75769026

WORRY-FREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WORRY-FREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Van Hoozer

Thomas H. Van Hoozer HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 Mastin Blvd.Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011RESIDENTIAL WATER HEATERS, FURNACES, AIR CONDITIONS, AND HOME APPLIANCES, NAMELY, OVENS, STOVES AND REFRIGERATORSACTIVE
036FINANCING SERVICES FOR THE PURCHASE AND REPAIR OF APPLIANCES AND HEATING, VENTILATION AND COOLING SYSTEMSACTIVE
037PROVIDING APPLIANCE REPAIR, REPAIR AND INSTALLATION OF HEATING, VENTILATION AND COOLING SYSTEMS, MAID SERVICES, CARPET CLEANING SERVICES, ELECTRICAL REPAIRS AND ELECTRICAL WIRING AND INSTALLATION, PESTS CONTROL, PLUMBING, PAINTING, CARPENTRY WINDOW INSTALLATION, AND SIDING INSTALLATIONACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 1, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 31, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 20, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance