USPTO serial 75770087
USA VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with USA VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA ROSENBURGH
LISA ROSENBURGH ESQ SQUADRON ELLENOFF PLESENT & SHEINFELD551 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR CONVERTING AND DELIVERING LIVE OR RECORDED VIDEO FROM AN ANALOG SOURCE TO AN END USER'S VIEWING DEVICE (PC or TV) VIA THE GLOBAL WORLD WIDE WEB, INTRANET, WIRELESS AND SATELLITE NETWORKS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MEDIA ASSET MANAGEMENT, MEDIA AND APPLICATION HOSTING, MULTIMODE CONTENT DISTRIBUTION, AND TRANSACTION DATA CAPTURE AND REPORTING | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |