USPTO serial 75771975
E-CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for electronic commerce and customer self-service through interactive databases, namely, electronic bill presentment and payment, service and account portfolio management, work flow and mediation, and multi media product catalogs accessible by the worldwide computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |