USPTO serial 75775139
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. PENNINGTON
EDWARD A. PENNINGTON BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN2020 K STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1806UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating systems; computer software, namely, knowledge management software for use in the searching, manipulating and dissemination of data, namely, the accessing, archiving, maintaining and distributing database information, data, images and sounds over local, national, and worldwide information networks to personal data assistants, personal computers, or cellular telephones of multiple users for processing, searching and sorting such database information, data, images and sounds | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services for dissemination of knowledge management information, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, documents and sounds via computer terminals and networks; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network via the integration of internal computer networks and global computer networks to computers, handheld computers, telephones and pagers; electronic mail services; and facsimile transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic storage of data, images, documents, and sounds | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |