USPTO serial 75775781
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
Lara Grajales, Puebla, MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
COLONIA NOCHEBUENA, MX
PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
Lara Grajales, Puebla, MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
Lara Grajales, Puebla, MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS ALIMENTICIOS LA MORENA, S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Gurak
Richard J. Gurak Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned or preserved Mexican food, namely,; sliced red pickled jalapeno peppers, pickled carrots, chipotle peppers in adobo sauce, pickled serrano peppers, sliced green pickled jalapeno peppers, sliced green pickled nacho jalapeno peppers [, and [ pickled ] * prickly * pear au [ natural ] *naturel * ] | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 1972 |
| 030 | Home made style chipotle sauce, home made style Mexican [ sauce ] * salsa * | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 1972 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |