Drawing for LA MORENA

USPTO serial 75775781

LA MORENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2710323Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2003
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with LA MORENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Gurak

Richard J. Gurak Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned or preserved Mexican food, namely,; sliced red pickled jalapeno peppers, pickled carrots, chipotle peppers in adobo sauce, pickled serrano peppers, sliced green pickled jalapeno peppers, sliced green pickled nacho jalapeno peppers [, and [ pickled ] * prickly * pear au [ natural ] *naturel * ]ACTIVEJan 3, 1972
030Home made style chipotle sauce, home made style Mexican [ sauce ] * salsa *ACTIVEJan 3, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2023RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 31, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 31, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 15, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 13, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 12, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 25, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 18, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 22, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 30, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jun 23, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
May 14, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2003COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
May 22, 2003AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 22, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED
Nov 7, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 7, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 5, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 5, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 5, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 17, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance