USPTO serial 75776496
EKITTIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EKITTIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard F. Mandelbaum
HOWARD F MANDELBAUM LEVINE & MANDELBAUM444 MADISON AVE 35TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Handheld unit for playing video games; video game cartridges; video game discs; handheld unit for playing computer games; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game tapes; computer game cartridges; and computer game cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, dolls, puppets, plush toy animals, plastic toy animals, toy animal figurines, toy vehicles, toy guns, board games, card games, jigsaw puzzles, water sports equipment, namely, boogie boards and balls and nets for water volleyball, toy tables, toy chairs, toy balls, sports balls, ice skates, roller skates, in-line skates, checker sets, chess sets, Christmas tree decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website on global computer networks featuring adoption, breeding, nursing, feeding, raising, and training of virtual pets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leisure Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Leisure Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EKITTIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |