USPTO serial 75781086
SPARKMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199977Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPARKMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harrow, Ontario, CA
Harrow, Ontario, CA
Harrow, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall J. Knuth
RANDALL J KNUTH RANDALL J KNUTH PC1507 YUMA CTMURFREESBORO, TN 37129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DIELECTRIC FLUIDS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE MACHINING FLUIDS USED IN INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL EDM METAL MACHINE SHOPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Oil Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Oil Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Oil Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SPARKMASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |