Drawing for MAPWIRE.COM

USPTO serial 75784995

MAPWIRE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAPWIRE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOUGLAS R. BUSH

DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NONDOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE PROGRAMS, AND PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF MAPPING, GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND LOCATIONAL SOLUTIONSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 28, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 28, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 27, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 15, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 6, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance