USPTO serial 75784995
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS R. BUSH
DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NONDOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE PROGRAMS, AND PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF MAPPING, GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION AND LOCATIONAL SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |