USPTO serial 75788239
EC-STREET.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EC-STREET.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A Arrett
Richard A. Arrett Vidas, Arrett & Steinkraus P.A.6640 Shady Oak Rd.Suite 400Eden Prairie, MN 55344Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; BANK CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, EFT CARD PROCESSING, ATM CARD PROCESSING, DEBIT CARD PROCESSING AND CREDIT CARD PROCESSING; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, BANKING TRANSACTION PROCESSING; AND FINANCIAL MERCHANT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |