USPTO serial 75790857
KENNETH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KENNETH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N. ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, makeup, compacts containing makeup, cosmetic pencils, eye makeup remover, non-medicated lip balm, beauty masks, facial scrubs, skin soap, bath gel, bath salts, shampoo, non-medicated hair care preparations; shaving cream, shaving balm; baby, bath, body and massage oils; skin lotion; body, eye, hand and skin cream-- baby and face powder; deodorants and antiperspirants; fragrances, namely, perfumes, colognes and toilet water; sun screen preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | coats, jackets, overcoats, rainwear and topcoats, suits, blazers, shirts, slacks, dresses, sweaters, jeans, t-shirts, sweatshirts, swim wear, shorts; underwear, loungewear, lingerie, robes and pajamas; neckwear, scarves, gloves, mittens, headwear, belts; footwear, socks and hosiery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |