USPTO serial 75793379
DIANE GILMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2889409Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIANE GILMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN M. ROSENBERG
STEPHEN M. ROSENBERG JENKENS & GILCHRIST PARKER CHAPIN LLPTHE CHRYSLER BUILDING405 LEXINGTON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | AFGHANS, BED BLANKETS, BED CANOPIES, BED LINEN, BED SHEETS, BED SPREADS, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, COMFORTERS, DUVET COVERS, DUST RUFFLES, DUVETS, EIDERDOWN QUILTS, QUILTS, UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE COVERS, WINDOW CURTAINS, DRAPERIES, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, TABLE LINEN, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, TOWELS, AND WASHCLOTHS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |