Drawing for STALINSKAYA

USPTO serial 75793980

STALINSKAYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STALINSKAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY M. SAMUELS

KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ PC2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAYSUITE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC DISTILLED BEVERAGES, PARTICULARLY VODKAABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 15, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Apr 19, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 9, 2002IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Feb 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance