USPTO serial 75797304
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wade Kerrigan, William Kircher, Richard Johnson, Lara Dickey Lewis, William Lewis, III, Nathan Oleen
Wade Kerrigan Blackwell Sanders LLP4801 Main StreetSuite 1000Kansas City, MO 64111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others through the issuance of gift certificates via the Internet that may be redeemed from participating third-party merchants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |