USPTO serial 75802270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE CO., INC.
NORWALK, CT
SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
NORWALK, CT
Other trademarks owned by SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
Babylon, NY
Babylon, NY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | baby foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | banana chips, fruit chips, yucca chips, sweet potato chips, beet chips, carrot chips, zucchini chips; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, and/or vegetables; canned foods, namely, vegetables, baked beans, beans, fruits, meats, fish and shellfish; soup, concentrates and dry mixes for preparing soups; canned sauces, namely, apple and cranberry | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | corn chips; flour-based chips; grain-based chips; taco chips; tortilla chips; breads; macaroni; packaged rice; packaged couscous; bakery goods; prepared meals consisting primarily of rice and pasta; condiments, namely, ketchup, mustard, relish, mayonnaise, tartar sauce, salsa, soy sauce, marinade sauce and barbecue sauce; seasonings and spices; canned sauces; mixes for making macaroni and cheese; mixes for making salad dressings; mixes for making pancakes; mixes for making biscuits; mixes for making waffles; mixes for making muffins; mixes for making cakes; mixes for making icings; mixes for making pilafs; mixes for making breads; mixes for making cookies; mixes for making brownies; mixes for making cheesecakes; mixes for making puddings and mixes for making gelatin desserts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |