USPTO serial 75810857
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, CA
NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
Toronto, ONTARIO M3C 3R6, CA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
Toronto, ONTARIO M4G 3V7, CA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
Toronto, ONTARIO M4G 3V7, CA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL BROADCAST READING SERVICE INC., THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
Richard A. Flynt Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, LLP1300 19th Street, NWSuite 600Washington, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DVD'S,[ VIDEOCASSETTE TAPES] AND CD-ROM'S CONTAINING FILMS AND NARRATIONS OF FILMS AND OTHER VISUAL WORKS FOR USE BY THE VISION-IMPAIRED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |