USPTO serial 75811167
LUNAR LANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNAR LANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GUELPH, ONTARIO, CA
GUELPH, ONTARIO, CA
Guelph, Ontario N1K 1N5
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R.BRANT LATHAM
R BRANT LATHAM RICHES, MCKENSIE & HERBERTSTE 2900, 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | LAWN AND GARDEN TRACTORS AND IMPLEMENTS THEREFORE; ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES; AND WAGONS, TRAILERS AND CARTS FOR LAWN AND GARDEN TRACTORS AND ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SNOWBEAR LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by 1652344 ONTARIO INC
- Other trademarks owned by Bear Metal Products Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named LUNAR LANDER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |