USPTO serial 75816344
BE WHAT YOU WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261357Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BE WHAT YOU WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spring Valley, CA
Spring Valley, CA
EAST PALO ALTO, CA
Spring Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD M. PETERS
HOWARD M PETERS PETERS VERNY JONES & BIKSA LLP425 SHERMAN AVE STE 230PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CASUAL CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN, BOYS AND GIRLS NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, WOMEN'S AND GIRL'S TOPS, SWEAT SHORTS, SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, BASKETBALL SHIRTS, FOOTBALL SHIRTS, SOCCER SHIRTS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, CAPS, JOGGING SUITS AND SWEAT PANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MDA INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MDA INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MUSTAFA, HALIM
- Other trademarks owned by MDA INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BE WHAT YOU WEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |