USPTO serial 75816686
CONNECTED CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONNECTED CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
DAVID A LOWE BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC816 2ND AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-1502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management; health industry cost containment; health industry utilization and review services; data processing services in the health industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Administration over an online network of patient data and protocols for patient health care management with health plans and providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing health-related information for interpreting, compiling, manipulating and organizing data and reports derived from and related to patients and patient populations' responses to queries, reminders, notifications, alerts and other health-related protocol, and based on the data and reports so derived, creating predictive and cost models and developing confidence parameters, trends and other statistical information; dissemination of instructions and protocols for others relating to health via an online electronic communications network; online health-related services related to patient care featuring a wide variety of computer services used in connection with health; electronic transmission of health-related data and documents via computer terminals via an online communications network; providing an interactive website featuring information relating to health; online batch data processing computer services in the health industry; providing health information via an online communications network; computer programming for others in the health industry and communications regarding health; computer software consulting services, namely, computer aided design, development and integration of software for use in patient monitoring information systems; computer technical support services, namely, telephone, on-site and on-line monitoring of computer software and troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems for use in the field of clinical research and health management; educational and training services, namely, classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the operation and use of computer hardware and software systems specifically designed for use in the field of clinical research and health industry management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |