USPTO serial 75817698
CHUPA CHUPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHUPA CHUPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cornella de Llobregat, ES
MILAN, IT
08034 Barcelona, ES
08034 Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP130 E RANDOLPH DRONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | confectionery, namely candy and gum | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enrique Bernat F., S. A.
- Other trademarks owned by PERFETTI VAN MELLE SPA
- Other trademarks owned by Enrique Bernat F., S. A.
- Other trademarks owned by Enrique Bernat F., S. A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHUPA CHUPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |