USPTO serial 75818929
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
3062 MA ROTTERDAM, NL
3062 MA ROTTERDAM, NL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heat power installations and steam processing systems including steam generators, valves, and radiators | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Sales promotion; publicity; advertising; marketing; providing material information to clients concerning purchase and sale of real property including through dissemination online and with advertising | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Building construction; repair; installation services related thereto | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | Transport and storage of chemical products, industrial and edible oils and products made therefrom, heat power installations and steam processing systems by various means of transportation | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy regarding the protection of the environment, sole research and soil depolution; scientific and industrial research; laboratory services and legal compliance | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |