USPTO serial 75819816
SHOT SPACE HARDWARE OPTIMIZATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOT SPACE HARDWARE OPTIMIZATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carrithers
SCOTT DUVALL MIDDLETOWN & REUTLINGER2500 B & W TOWER401 S Fourth AveLOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Material treatment services for the custom manufacture for others of the following goods - namely, metal and plastic machine tools, scientific instruments for quantitative and qualitative analysis, robotics, electrical and mechanical and electro-mechanical components, chemical and drug and polymers processing equipment, laboratory equipment, tools, instruments and devices, for medical experimentation, electrical/mechanical/chemical/pharmaceutical components and devices for the study of cell biology, genetics, and microbiology, and chemical, electrochemical, and magnetic processing equipment for use in gravity and non-gravity environments, including forming, fabricating, welding, molding, extruding, assembling and operating and developing computer software | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | engineering research, development, testing, verifying, and integrating and custom design for others of metal and plastic machine tools, instruments, and components, flight hardware, pharmaceutical, medical, chemical, and biological processing equipment, and computer software and hardware for biological, pharmaceutical, medical, electrical, and chemical systems for earth and space applications, including drafting specifications for manufacture, and consulting services to NASA regarding same | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Space Hardware Optimization Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Space Hardware Optimization Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHOT SPACE HARDWARE OPTIMIZATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |