USPTO serial 75820042
SICEL TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SICEL TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TELEMETRY IMPLANTS FOR USE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |