USPTO serial 75820053
WE'RE HERE FOR THE BEER EST. 1909 B BEERMANN'S BEERWERKS LINCOLN ROSEVILLE CA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WE'RE HERE FOR THE BEER EST. 1909 B BEERMANN'S BEERWERKS LINCOLN ROSEVILLE CA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Cordova, CA
Rancho Cordova, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | BOTTLING OF BEER AND FILLING BEER BARRELS AND KEGS | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEERMANN LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BEERMANN LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named WE'RE HERE FOR THE BEER EST. 1909 B BEERMANN'S BEERWERKS LINCOLN ROSEVILLE CA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |