USPTO serial 75820116
SULEKHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SULEKHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | Computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information, including a variety of content contributed by users; providing a wide range of general interest information via computer networks; computer bulletin and message boards in fields of general interest; online retail and mail order services; design, creation, hosting, maintenance and promotion of Web sites for others; consulting and technical assistance in the field of designing, creating, hosting, maintenance, operating, managing, advertising, and marketing on online commerce Web sites; providing online facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest and playing games; online travel and lodging reservation and booking services; directory services to help locate people, places, organizations, phone numbers, home pages, and electronic mail address; and club services relating to the Internet and Internet searching and web sites; publishing of articles written by users or contributors | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |