Drawing for SK KINGS

USPTO serial 75820823

SK KINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SK KINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio, video, computer and laser discs, namely, pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, pre-recorded audio and video tapes, pre-recorded compact discs in the field of basketball; computer accessories, namely mouse pads, mice, disc cases, computer carry-on cases, keyboard wrist pads, computer monitor cardboard frames, all related to basketball; pre-recorded computer discs and computer programs containing databases for displaying information, statistics or trivia about basketball, pre-recorded computer discs containing computer games, computer operating systems in the field of basketball, computer software featuring basketball, namely screen savers; video game software, video game cartridges and video game machines for use with televisions; radios and telephones; binoculars; sunglasses, eyeglass frames, eyewear straps and chains, eyeglass and sunglass cases; magnetsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 22, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 22, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 16, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 10, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 16, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 22, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2000REINREINSTATED
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance