Drawing for DOUGIE MILLINGS & SON (ORIGINAL BEATLESTAILOR) LTD

USPTO serial 75820964

DOUGIE MILLINGS & SON (ORIGINAL BEATLESTAILOR) LTD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DOUGIE MILLINGS & SON (ORIGINAL BEATLESTAILOR) LTD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, SUITS, OVERCOATS, RAINCOATS, WAISTCOATS, TIES, CUMMERBUNDS, MEN'S UNDERWEAR, SCARVES, GLOVES, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, T-SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, JEANS, BELTS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SLIPPERS, BOOTS AND SANDALS; AND HEADWEAR, NAMELY, HATS AND CAPSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 24, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 24, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 13, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 2, 2001CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY
Sep 4, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 9, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
Feb 22, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 14, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 4, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 4, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance