USPTO serial 75822075
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Mountain View, CA
REDMOND, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Anne Matheson
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVISION OF INFORMATION AND CONSULTATION RELATED THERETO BY TELEPHONE ON A WIDE VARIETY OF SUBJECTS, NAMELY, PROVISION OF BUSINESS AND/OR TRADE INFORMATION; COMMERCIAL INFORMATION PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF ADVERTISING SPACE; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING OF OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, NAMELY, A TELEPONE NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING NEWS RELATING TO CURRENT EVENTS VIA TELEPHONE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | IIOA | INADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |