USPTO serial 75822901
STREAMSCAPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STREAMSCAPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY INFORMATIONAL, MOTIVATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL VIDEO PRESENTATIONS IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE, BUSINESS, TECHNOLOGY, HEALTH AND RECREATION; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A TELEVISION PROGRAM IN THE FIELDS OF DRAMA, COMEDY AND NEWS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PRODUCTION OF VIDEO PROGRAMS FOR USE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Eyes Multimedia Productions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named STREAMSCAPES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |