USPTO serial 75823456
IPLANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPLANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; e-commerce software for managing distributed transactions; e-commerce software for use in automating business processes; e-commerce software for personalized service automation; e-commerce software for value-chain integration; e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global or non-global computer network; e-commerce software for use in financial transaction processing and management; e-commerce software for creating customized on-line portals; software for use in connecting wireless devices to electronic networks for use in e-commerce; software for use in developing, deploying and managing on-line application services; software for use in developing content for Internet web sites for use in e-commerce; on-line billing software; on-line procurement software; e-commerce operations software; commerce exchange software; e-commerce infrastructure software; electronic message software; software developer collaboration software; work group collaboration software; calendaring software; computer network security software; infrastructure software for Internet service providers; infrastructure software for telecommunications service providers; infrastructure software for e-commerce application service providers; server operating, application and utility software; server software for enabling wireless access to electronic messaging, electronic calendaring, electronic scheduling and electronic directories; computer and computer network utility software; software for use in developing and executing other software; audio and video streaming software; computer software for use in connecting, sending and receiving information over internal and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |