USPTO serial 75823986
PERFECT INGREDIENTS FOR PERFECT HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2003
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT INGREDIENTS FOR PERFECT HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75008 Paris, FR
75008 Paris, FR
73008 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fingar LLP11 Martine Avenue12th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10606-1934Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products, namely, hair care preparations, hair lotions, hair creams, hair oils, hair shampoos, hair sprays, non-medicated hair balms; sun repair products, namely, hair conditioners, [ hair rinses, ] styling lotions, hair gels, hair styling glaze, hair tonics, [ permanent wave preparations, hair coloring, hair bleach, ] hair polish, hair styling foams, damaged hair restorers, hair moisturizing creams, skin moisturizing serum and hair straightening preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |