Drawing for Serial No. 75824285

USPTO serial 75824285

Serial No. 75824285

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75824285?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CIGARSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 13, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 1, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 1, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 4, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2006MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
Mar 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2006REINREINSTATED
Jan 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance