USPTO serial 75824445
MEDIA HARDWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIA HARDWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Aftermarket accessories for home electronics and audio-video systems, namely, audio speakers, cable, connectors, connecting hardware, switches, meters, remote control units and remote control signal extenders | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2004 |
| 035 | Retail and online stores in the fields of electrical and electronic devices and instruments, namely, audio speakers, speaker wire, audio patch cords, electrical connectors, speaker control boxes, television mounts, speaker brackets and mounting hardware for speakers, stereo cabinetry, microphones and signal and sound level meters, and audio-video equipment aftermarket products; mail order and telephone ordering services in the fields of electrical and electronic devices and instruments, namely audio speakers, speaker wire, audio patch cords, electrical connectors, speaker control boxes, television mounts, speaker brackets and mounting hardware for speakers, stereo cabinetry, microphones and signal and sound level meters, and audio-video equipment aftermarket products | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIA HARDWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIA HARDWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIA HARDWARE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MEDIA HARDWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |