USPTO serial 75824687
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-22335 Hamburg, DE
D-22335 Hamburg, DE
D-22335 Hamburg, DE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Organizational consultation in the nature of business management consultation for others in the field of aviation, including advice on the purchase and sale of aircraft; providing trade information for others, namely, through the compilation and supply of information via a web site on the Internet on technical innovations relating to aircraft or parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Aircraft repair and maintenance for others, namely, performed by aircraft engineers, flight engineers, flight mechanics and interior designers; repair and maintenance, for third parties, of aircraft power plants, aircraft engines, aircraft electronic and optical equipment and aircraft motor drive mechanisms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Initial and ongoing training of flight and ground personnel employed by third parties in the use of equipment on aircraft and equipment for aircraft ground handlers and equipment for aircraft towing and handling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Interior engineering design for aircraft for others; inspection of aircraft and parts thereof for others; technical consultation and research for others in the field of aviation, including advice on the purchase and sale of aircraft; product development for others, namely, production and development of electronic data processing inspection and overhaul programs for aircraft and parts thereof; engineering services for others, namely, services of an aircraft engineer, flight engineer, flight mechanic, interior designer, electronic data processing engineer, and computer scientist | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |