USPTO serial 75824980
UTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Unified Technologies Advanced Research International Ltd
Richmond, British Columbia V6V 2X7, CA
Other trademarks owned by Unified Technologies Advanced Research International Ltd
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION AND BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, MARKETING SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMMERCIAL ENTITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPING SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMMERCIAL ENTITIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UTAR LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Unified Technologies Advanced Research International Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UTAR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |