Drawing for SNOWMOBILE TRADER

USPTO serial 75825078

SNOWMOBILE TRADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2497300Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2001
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNOWMOBILE TRADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER IN THE FIELD OF SNOWMOBILES AND RELATED SNOWMOBILE MERCHANDISE FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 15, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Oct 12, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 12, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Jan 18, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 4, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 17, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance